# 6. Token Economic Model

The manadia token ($MA) is positioned as a native functional token for system operation and value coordination, rather than a certificate of yield rights or governance rights. Its primary functions are designed around four dimensions: measurement, settlement, risk constraints, and long-term coordination.

#### 6.1 Core Utilities of the Token

1. Unified Unit for Participation State and Rights Measurement\
   In applications such as Potion, users’ long-term participation trajectories are abstracted into “state points,” which are ultimately converted into $MA-denominated units for cross-scenario comparison and transfer of rights.
2. Internal Gas for Rights Expansion and Settlement\
   Each instance of rights release, usage, decay, or reclamation consumes a small amount of $MA as settlement fuel (with a dynamic fee rate adjusted by Agents based on network congestion and rights value).
3. VERITAS Node Staking and Slashing Collateral\
   Both pricing nodes and challenge nodes are required to stake $MA. Malicious behavior triggers tiered slashing (ranging from 5% to 100%), with slashed funds entering the protocol treasury to subsidize honest nodes and ecosystem incentives.
4. Economic Constraint for AI Agent Operation and State Maintenance\
   Each long-running Agent must stake a minimum amount of $MA as a “credit base.” In cases of decision failure or successful challenges, the staked amount is reduced, preventing low-cost Sybil attacks.
5. Cross-Scenario Coordination and Arbitrage Suppression\
   $MA is used as a bridging medium for rights exchange across different vertical applications, and a dynamic decay mechanism (where token capability decays exponentially after participation interruption) is employed to suppress short-term speculative participation.

#### 6.2 Issuance and Distribution Principles

* Total Supply: Fixed upper limit
* Initial circulation is primarily allocated to: early ecosystem incentives, VERITAS node staking rewards, Potion content provider subsidies, and locked allocations for the core team and advisors.
* Inflation mechanism: necessary subsidies for long-term operation of VERITAS and Agents (which can be gradually reduced to zero through protocol governance).
* Deflationary pressure: settlement consumption + slashing of malicious behavior + reclamation from rights decay.

The manadia economic model deliberately avoids design paths such as “holding equals yield” or “high-APY staking,” instead deeply binding the token to the system’s actual operational load and security requirements.


---

# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation

If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:

```
GET https://mana.gitbook.io/mana-docs/manadia-whitepaper/6.-token-economic-model.md?ask=<question>
```

The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
